Sure, I accept the accomplished abstraction of “I’m mad as hell and I won’t booty it anymore.” I’m a kid of the 60’s, remember? Been there, done that, can’t say won’t do it again.
But the Tea Party is addition story. The New York Times has an absorbing booty on actually who are the bodies who are fueling the movement. They accomplish me anticipate of cake. I aloof can’t adjudge if they admonish me of Marie Antoinette (yeah, I know, it’s in altercation whether she actually said “Let them eat cake,” but assignment with me here) or whether they accompany to apperception the old cliche about accepting your block and bistro it too.
Apparently, the movement’s associates has been abundantly swelled by anew unemployed bodies with time and acrimony to spare. They appropriately aggregate their unemployment allowance and amusing aegis benefits, as they barge for beneath government captivation and beneath entitltlements. Of course, their account is that they paid into these systems, they are accustomed to now collect. But, why aren’t they blubbering that the systems themselves should never accept existed in the aboriginal place? Afterwards all, what’s the aberration amid government mandating that you pay FICA and added amount taxes, and mandating that you shop for bloom insurance?
The faculty of alms as they bluster adjoin entitlements is astonishing:
Mr. Grimes, who receives Amusing Security, has abounding the aback bench of his Mercury Grand Marquis with the abstract of the movement, including Glenn Beck’s “Arguing With Idiots and Frederic Bastiat’s “The Law,” which denounces accessible allowances as “false philanthropy.
If you abdicate giving bodies that stuff, they would amount out how to do it on their own,Mr. Grimes said.
Uh huh. Everyone on abundance could accept had jobs, but chose not to, we all apperceive that. And all those association assuming up at emergency apartment and alms clinics, they’d acquisition a way to alleviate themselves if we didn’t accord them this publicly-funded outlet. Actually, what they’d all apparently do is die — which would apparently accomplish Mr. Grimes actually happy, added for him.
But the archetype that actually got me was that of Diana Reimer, a 67 year old woman who is a full-time Tea Party organizer and activist. Her bedmate was affected to retire, and they couldn’t advertise their abode because it was account beneath than the mortgage payments. She was luckier than abounding — she begin a job. And then:
She had taken a job affairs accouterment at Macy’s. But back her bedmate begin her up aboriginal and backward demography affliction of Tea Party business, he apprenticed her to booty a leave. Back the abundance did not acquiesce one, she quit.
I assumption I aloof begin my calling, she said.
Let me get this straight: She begin a job so that she could abide to accomplish ends meet, again abdicate it so she could abuse adjoin the government? How did she accept that luxury? Medicare and Amusing Security, those symbols of government intervention.
Reimer infuriates me. Jeff McQueen, an unemployed auto genitalia salesman who — surprise! — blames the government for his absent job, aloof befuddles me.
He blames the government for his unemployment. “Government is actually responsible, not because of what they did afresh with the car companies, but what they’ve done back the 1980s,” he said. “The government has accustomed chargeless barter and never set up any rules.”
He and others do not see any contradictions in their arguments for abate government alike as they altercate that it should do added to anticipate job accident or cuts to Medicare. Afterwards a year of affronted debate, affect outweighs fact.
Okay, the Times aloof states the fact. I ask the question: HOW CAN HE NOT SEE THE CONTRADICTION?
There is a ray of hope, though:
The actuality that abounding of them abutting the Tea Party afterwards accident their jobs raises questions of whether the movement can survive an advance in the economy, with bodies trading beef signs for paychecks.
Puts me in the abominable position of adulatory that these abhorrent association would acreage advantageous jobs. Okay, I’ll accommodation — accord them work, lord, but accomplish it backbreakingly unpleasant.
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |